monarchy is undemocratic
women's and men's legislatures require
oversight
judiciaries interpret law
elders shed light
dispute your gender
can't agree
elder oversight
governance
by agreement between women's and men's
legislatures
presided over by elders
accompanied by courts of women's and men's
jurisdiction
is smart.
Whilst a monarchy is undemocratic and thus
largely symbolic, there is a role for executive to preside over legislatures and
the delivery of justice in courts.
In smart government an executive of elders can
resolve dispoutes between women' s and men's legislatures through mediation and
conciliation or by inviking the power of the people through
reelection.
My source on Diana was Tina Brown's unputdownable
read, "The Diana
Chronicles," published by
Century, London, 2007.
Just to add to some further information on the
"power"
that the Monarch actually has... (Taken from - The
World Book
Encyclopedia - vol.11 - J-K, p. 258,
"Kings and queens of Britain and
Ireland..."
and I quote:
"In the past, kings and queens had great
power in
Britain and Ireland.
Today, the 'monarch' in Britain has
little power
but is still highly respected. ...She serves as a
figurehead
and a symbol of unity for people in
Britain and the
Commonwealth...
The monarch's role in British politics is part of
the
un-written British constitution. As a constitutional
monarch, the
...queen is head of state. She holds
office with the aid and agreement of an
elected
Parliament. The Parliament provides the government.
The
monarch's duties are now mainly ceremonial..."
Cheers.
Yabby, in a constitutional democracy, the people elect legislatures to
supervise their activites.
accountability is subject to the electoral
process.
absent provision for women's legislatures, men's legislatures,
which allow women entry under male supervision, supervise the people, thus all
women remain under male supervision.
whether a female Governor-General,
under male supervision in an office intended according to the Constitution of
Australia at its enactment be held exclusively by men, sacks a female Prime
Minister, again under male supervision in an office intended according to the
Constitution of Australia at its enactment be held exclusively by men, the
Governor-General, the Prime Minister, the people and even the Queen, post Magna
Carta, who acts upon the advice of men's legislatures, remain under male
supervision.
the Constitution acknowledges these offices and is the
governing arbiter.
absent provision for women's legislatures, women are
not free to take on any of these offices in their own
right.